java五种拼接字符串的方法和效率对比

1580阅读 0评论2017-04-24 sun5411
分类:Java

package test;
import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
public class CutString {
    //性能最差
    public String testPlus() {
        String s = "";
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            s = s + String.valueOf(i);
        }
        return s;
    }
    //较好
    public String testConcat() {
        String s = "";
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            s = s.concat(String.valueOf(i));
        }
        return s;
    }
     
    //性能与testStringBuffer相差无几,比其要好
    public String testJoin() {
        String[] list = new String[10000];
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            list[i] = String.valueOf(i);
        }
        return StringUtils.join(list, "");
    }
    public String testStringBuffer() {
        StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
        long l1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            sb.append(String.valueOf(i));
        }
        long l2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println(l2-l1);
        return sb.toString();
    }
     
    //性能最高的方法
    public void testStringBuilder() {
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            sb.append(String.valueOf(i));
        }
        sb.toString();
    }
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println(new CutString().testStringBuffer());
    }
}


运行结果如下:

11:00:22,359  INFO TestString:23 - + cost 1828 ms
11:00:22,921  INFO TestString:34 - concat cost 562 ms
11:00:22,937  INFO TestString:46 - StringUtils.join cost 16 ms
11:00:22,968  INFO TestString:58 - StringBuffer cost 31 ms
11:00:23,031  INFO TestString:70 - StringBuilder cost 63 ms

上一篇:系统运维工程师的法宝:python paramiko
下一篇:解析storm的KafkaSpout